Chelsea preview: In it to win it

Written by Wolfie on February 19th, 2010

Wolves have a terrible recent record against Chelsea, losing three, winning none, drawing none, and conceeding 14 in the Premier League.  Chelsea, I hear, have a rather good recent record against most teams and are currently sitting on the top of the League.  They do however, have surprisingly fragile away form of late, coming straight from an away defeat against Everton, and on the back of only one win in six.

Realistically, however, few people will expect Wolves to come away with anything from this.  Given the recent dodgy decision by the Premier League to make an example of Wolves following the ‘weakened side’ debacle at Man U, however, we can be sure good old Mick won’t risk the appearance of not going all out for this.  And if the team can match that appearance with some of the genuine belief so lacking at Stamford Bridge earlier in the season, then I say, why not hope for a point at least.

Defensively, Wolves sucked last time, but let’s take a moment to look at November’s line up:

Hennessey
Halford, Craddock, Berra, Stearman
Surman, Edwards, Henry, Castillo (Knightly 52), Jarvis
Ebanks-Blake (Keogh 62)

Assuming Wolves stay with the line up that was so successful against Spurs two weeks ago, tomorrow we’ll be looking at:

Hahnemann
Zubar, Craddock, Berra, Ward (Elokobi 60),
Foley, Guedioura (Mancienne 72), Henry (capt), Jones, Jarvis (Milijaš 80)
Doyle

The only possible areas in which that isn’t a stronger line-up is the replacement of Edwards by Foley, and more debatably, Stearman by Ward/Elokobi.  Foley isn’t doing too bad but still looks far from right as an attacking winger, and while Ward has converted with remarkable ease from striker to left back, his one weakness (and it’s a big one) is to back off and back off and then see the ball sail past into the back of the net.

That aside:

Doyle for Ebanks-Blake – while I still believe Ebanks-Blake will make an impression on this League one day, this one’s a no brainer.
Jones for Castillo – there’s nothing wrong with Castillo, but Jones has a great wins to appearances ratio, and looked to have shapness and quality on his full return to the team two weeks ago.
Guedioura for Surman – Guedioura looked strong, clever and positive in his last two appearances; without being a bad player, Surman has looked none of these in any of his 6 showings so far.
Zubar for Halford – despite a strange desire to flap and foul in key areas, Zubar is going to be a good Premier League player for Wolves.  Halford will eventually be a good Championship player for someone.
Hahnemann for Hennessey – I think this will be the big difference between the two games.  Hennessey will be a good all-round goalkeeper one day, rather than the great shot-stopper he has shown himsef to be so far, but Hahnemann’s greater ability to come out and claim a cross and to communicate with his defenders before the ball is in the back of the net will be critical if Wolves are going to put in a solid defensive show in what is likely to be the most testing of circumstances.

If Chelsea play to their best, none of this will matter, but with enough belief (and perhaps a bit of luck) Wolves can hope to frustrate Chelsea and take something more than pride from this game.

Prediction: 1 (Berra) – 1 (who cares)

Post to Twitter

 

Doyle: sleep more, score more

Written by Wolfie on February 17th, 2010

Kevin Doyle, Wolves’ stand out player of the season so far, reports on the Official Wolves site that he’s in the form of his life.

I’m not going to argue with his claim that he has been playing well, that his all round play has improved, and I certainly hope he is right that his best years are ahead of him.  I’m pleased to hear Doyle assert that he’s fitter and stronger and that Wolves work him harder than ever.  He says he’s learned to “sleep better, generally look after myself and be more professional in everything I do”.

Maybe if I were a Reading fan I’d be a little bit narked by the implication that he ate junk food, stayed up too late and didn’t exercise when he played for them (and I’m sure this isn’t the case - Mr Doyle seems a lovely young man).  However, as a Wolves fan, all I’m going to ask is: can he beat his first Premier League tally of 13 goals for Reading?  I hope so, but even if not, and if Wolves stay up,  there will be no doubt that his all round play will have been instrumental in this.

Post to Twitter

 

Transfer Window Review

Written by Wolfie on February 12th, 2010

With no game at all this weekend for Wolves, having been so unceremoniously dumped out of the cup last week, I am free to let my mind wander to higher things.

Right, having done that, now would also be an opportune time to review Wolves’s activity in the recent transfer window. For all the positive news coming of Molineux last summer, and for all the positive action we are assured took place this window, Wolves net gain is 2 loanees from Belgian club Charleroi.  Is this enough?

Our esteemed CEO, Jez Moxey, reports that several over-the-odds and/or record breaking bids were made for three players: 7m for Adam Johnson, who untimately ended up at Man City; 5m for Stephen Hunt who stayed with Hull; and an undisclosed bid to bring Robbie Keane back to Molineux on Loan.  Keane opted for the delights of Scottish football instead. 

Any of these players (with the arguable exception of Keane, where sentiment may have won out against rantionality) would have improved the team.  Wanting them shows ambition and no fear of splashing the cash. 

It’s easy to say with hindsight, but the odds of ever having to part with the money, however, were always small.  However cash-strapped Hull might be, they would be prepared to gamble their balance sheet for another six months rather than part with a player who could be key to their Premiership survival to a relegation rival.  Johnson and Keane were always likely to have a choice, and always likely to chose a safer option.  I suspect, however that despite these objections, the management believed they might pull off one of these deals so I’m not going to criticise the lack of spending.

So, we have two low-cost loans – ultimately a gamble.  Handily, on the basis of two half games, it seems they may have hit the jackpot with Guedioura, who looks to be just what the doctor ordered in midfield.  I’ll diplomatically say that’s it’s too early to tell with Mujangi Bia. 

The business of the transfer window was disappointing, although not unexpectedly so, but I still maintain Wolves have just enough spirit and quality on their books to stay up this year.  But if they do, things have to change in the summer, because there won’t be many years worse than this in terms of the quality of the field.

Post to Twitter

 

Out of the Zone: Wolves 1-0 Tottenham

Written by Wolfie on February 11th, 2010

That’s much more like it. A great performance rewarded by a great result. It’s not great to have to make up for slipping up against the bottom half teams with unexpected wins against the top half. But it is kind of fun when you get them.

Spurs didn’t look like a team with top four pretensions on the day, but let’s not let that diminish the achievement – Wolves did look like a team with a serious intent, and more importantly belief, to stay in this League. Dave Jones looked pleased to be back in the starting line up, and we should be pleased to see him. Hahnemann wasn’t called on for shop-stopping heroics, but did all that was asked of him confidently, inspiring a vital confidence in the players in front of him. Doyle was as magnificent as ever, Jarvis looked threatening and produced a good cross for the goal, new boy Guedioura produced a good show to build on Sunday’s substitute appearance, and the team performance all round was enough to set Molineux grinning for once.

A double over Dirty ‘Arry’s boys to lift Wolves out the relegation zone. Doesn’t get much better than that.

Post to Twitter

 

Aaaagh: Crystal Palace 3-0 Wolves

Written by Wolfie on February 2nd, 2010

The tamest of tame exits for Wolves. Abysmal.

The only thing worse than the performance was the dire dire dire ITV4 commentary. This was far from the only offence, but to take a random example, to say twice on 80 minutes, when a team is three-nil down that they’ll have to score soon is, frankly, a waste of breath.  As you can see, I prefer to concentrate on the inadequacies of the TV commentary than the Wolves team.

The bright spots?  None.  Not even the goal.

Well done Palace and well done Danny Butterfield for a remarkable hatrick.

And now for an enforced, but possibly beneficial concentration on the League.  Must do better.  Much better.

Post to Twitter

 

Read all about it: Wigan – home – 16/1/10

Written by Wolfie on January 17th, 2010

Find the match reports below. Generally a sorry read:

Guardian | Times | Telegraph | Mail

Post to Twitter

 

Circus of Horrors: Wolves 0-2 Wigan

Written by Wolfie on January 16th, 2010

As the posters advertising ‘Circus of Horrors’ (Civic Hall, 30 Jan) mocked us on the way out of Wolverhampton, it wasn’t hard to see where the inspiration for this particular show might have come from.

The game started scrappily, with Wigan ultimately having the best of the first half.  Hahnemann pulled off a couple of impressive saves, and a bit of luck with a rebound off the inside of the crossbar kept Wolves in the game and in with a chance at 0-0 as half time was about to be blown. 

Then Stearman inexplicably pulled his man over, chasing a nothing ball towards the corner flag.  Penalty Wigan, and a second yellow for Stearman.  Wolves have conceeded some stupid penalties this season (the flailing handed Zubar winning my previous award for idiot of the week), but this outstripped all of them, and by some distance. 

That Wolves went in all square at half time was entirely due to the continued excellence of Hahnemann, who saved at least a few of Stearman’s blushes with his penalty save.

Wolves actually started the second half on top and created their best chances in the first 15 minutes, seemingly not missing their erstwhile right back at all, although Ebanks-Blake continued to frustrate.  However, as soon as James McCarthy slotted home Wigan’s opener the game was up.

Suddenly it was all Wigan, and the crowd gave up on the game at the same time as the team.  Thomas’s sending off for Wigan provided a moment of hope, but Wigan’s second goal hardly came as a surprise.  Molineux was all but empty, barring the 23 Wigan supporters who had bothered to make the journey, at the final whistle.

Post to Twitter

 

On thinking I may just be in the wrong job

Written by Wolfie on January 15th, 2010

We all know footballers earn obscene wages.  In the end we probably put it to the back of ours minds, because if you think about it too long, not only would your head probably explode (and in my case that means a lot of cotton wool everywhere), but it would be a lot more difficult to pay £40 to sit in the stands on a cold day and cheer on a team losing to Birmingham.

There is therefore no reason for me to even bat an eyelid when I read an article in the Guardian about tribunal findings regarding Daniel Sturridge’s move from Man City to Chelsea in the summer.  It seems Chelsea may end up paying up to £18.5 million after Sturridge left City as a free agent in the summer, having declined to renew his contract.  The paper also mentions that Sturridge’s wages at Chelsea will amount to £12 million over the course of his 4-year contract.

I think it’s the very casualness with which this fact is dropped so into the article as an aside that makes the whole thing more unsettling.  Clearly there is no cause for surprise that a footballer who has been selected for 3 first team starts in half a season should have been paid £60,000 a week for that work. 

I will therefore put it to the back of my mind and pretend it never happened.  Cake anyone?

Post to Twitter

 

Wolfie on the Move

Written by Wolfie on January 13th, 2010

I’ve had a busy few hours redesigning my little website for those of you with mobile telephones. It’s works very nicely on my iPhone, but I haven’t had an opportunity to check it on different systems so any comments, as ever, are most welcome.

It's me, only smaller

It's me, only smaller

Post to Twitter

 

To Spend or Not to Spend

Written by Wolfie on January 10th, 2010

That is the question.

Wolves spent mainly conservatively (by Premier League standards) in the summer, sticking to a tight (by Premier League standards) wage structure. As things stand today we are out of the relegation zone, but only just. So the question is, to spend big in an attempt to ensure survival or to hope we’ve just about got enough to stay up already, accept relegation if it comes and hope we’re in a good position to bounce back?

With the mid-season transfer window having been open for over a week now, the only direction transfers have gone so far at Molineux is out. It’s good to see Collins and Ward gainfully employed elsewhere, and Shackell off our hands on loan. I thank them for their wholehearted, if variable, service to the club and wish them the best for their future.

I’m happy to offer bets that we’re not going to see any big signings coming in in their place. Perhaps a couple along the lines of Surman and Halford. Maybe someone for the future, probably someone who will do anything asked of them, probably competently, but almost certainly not someone who will change our season. I think the barrier to this is less the one-off transfer fee than the ongoing wages anyone commanding the big fees would require.

I also suspect Mick McCarthy, who places a great emphasis on endeavour and team spirit, will fear bringing in too many new faces and displacing Wolves’ willing footsoldiers. In truth, the likes of Karl Henry, Stephen Ward and Matt Jarvis, along with most of Wolves first team from last year have generally impressed in the step up to the Premiership. However, long term, as a whole Wolves don’t constitute a team with the skill or flair on top of workrate likely to compete in this league consistently. This is the team we have however, and I believe, by and large, this is the team we’ll keep for now. So the question becomes: does this give us enough to survive?

On balance I think we have enough for this season, though probably not the next. One of the reasons for this is the solid work ethic of the team well augmented by the quality particularly of Milijas and Doyle; another is the meltdown experienced by other clubs who have spent too big for too long – Portsmouth, and to a lesser extent West Ham. Wolves will have to work hard to finish below Portsmouth (fingers crossed), and I think we have enough to avoid relegation against this somewhat weakened field.

Although Wolves seem sometimes destined to be one of those nearly teams for whom being mired in the slog of the second tier is second nature, our first (consecutive) season in the Premier League does not justify the risk of mimicking Portsmouth, or Leeds before them.

The balance is fine. Wolves should not risk spending too big, especially in terms of committing future funds in large pay deals for experienced players, but to stay in this league long term will need to further break a restrictive wage structure to compete in the same market as the likes of Stoke and Birmingham, never mind Manchester United. We need some degree of Premier League stability to take the risk, but stability is going to be hard to achieve without spending to rival our competitors. Currently I think Wolves have the balance right, but we’ll need to see a bigger change if we’re still here in July. And if that means losing some old faces and who have performed well for the club then, with some regret, so be it.

Good luck to all who will have to negotiate this fine line in the next few years.

Post to Twitter